Summary:
- A federal judge has dismissed Donald Trump's counter-defamation suit against writer Eugene Carroll.
- Eugene Carroll previously won a $5 million lawsuit against Trump, accusing him of sexual abuse and defamation.
- The judge's ruling takes into account Trump's statements about Carroll during his presidency.
- Another defamation case involving Trump is scheduled for January.
- Trump's legal team plans to appeal the federal judge's decision.
In a legal setback for former President Donald Trump, a federal judge has dismissed his counter-defamation lawsuit against writer Eugene Carroll. The suit arose after Carroll won a $5 million lawsuit accusing Trump of sexual abuse and defamation.
Legal Defeat for Trump
Another blow has been dealt to ex-President Donald Trump in the courtroom as a federal judge ruled against his counter-defamation lawsuit targeting writer Eugene Carroll. This development comes on the heels of Carroll's triumph in a $5 million lawsuit against Trump, wherein she accused him of both sexual abuse and defamation.Background and Lawsuit
E. Jean Carroll, a well-known writer, accused Trump of sexually assaulting her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the 1990s. Trump, in response, denied the allegations and stated that Carroll was 'not his type.' Following a legal battle, a jury awarded Carroll $5 million in damages, finding her claims credible. In light of this verdict, Carroll's statements on CNN prompted Trump to file a counter-defamation suit against her.Judge's Ruling and Future Steps
The federal judge's decision to dismiss Trump's defamation suit is a setback for the former president. The court's ruling takes into account the statements Trump made about Carroll during his tenure in the White House. The judge's decision has further implications as another defamation case involving Trump is scheduled for January. Despite this setback, Trump's legal team has expressed intentions to appeal the ruling.As legal battles continue to unfold, the clash between E. Jean Carroll and Donald Trump underscores the complex interplay between defamation, free speech, and allegations of sexual misconduct in the legal realm.